Wednesday, 28 May 2008

are you asking me along for breakfast?

we all have read in the papers about how US of A is treating countries not recognised as a Nuclear Weapons State. hmmmmm does Israel have nuclear weapons??? nahhh i dont think so... no wait. i believe they fucking have nuclear weapons. and wat US of A is reacting to that? well...sponsoring them motherfuckers i think.

see over the years reports in tabloids covered stories of the US of A condemning countries such as India or Pakistan conducting nuclear test and more recently North Korea. but wat is US of A doing against Israel?! Israel has declared a policy of nuclear opacity sidestepping questions such as " does Israel have nuclear weapons?" by not officially admitted to having nuclear weapons, instead repeating over the years that it would not be the first country to "introduce" nuclear weapons. FUCKING BULLSHIT. they have nuclear weapons since the 1960's. the world didnt know this till about 1986 when one of the offspring of the ape family revealed some nuclear secrets to a British press. but did it shocked the mighty US of A? did the US of A condemn? HELL NO BITCH. nothing to that extend. they seem relaxed about it. i think they knew from the beginning. Israel have bought uranium and heavy water from countries to start enriching the plutonium since the 1950's and US of A kept mum about it. fucking US of A...

the motive of Israel to have nuclear capability is to defend themselves against the Arabs in the middle east since they are the only non-Arab country there. (fucking Jews dont belong anywhere in this world actually) defend themselves against MUSLIMS. and wat the US of A responded to this was to sent nuclear inspectors to countries like Iran and Iraq to strip them of nuclear capabilities. US of fucking A was wrong. dead wrong. the IAEA inspectors found nothing of desire and US of A got a sore dick for that.

wat bothers this nuclear problem with Israel is the fact that the amount of firepower the Israeli have is classified. the nuclear yield, the number of warheads, the range and some other details. this is very dangerous in my books. AND YET "NOBODY" IS DOING ANYTHING ABOUT IT. no IAEA inspectors checking on the reactors and complexes. no statement issued from the "mightiest" country about infamy or blasphemy?

a rough estimation puts that they posses 75-200 warheads. thats more than china's or Britain's stockpile. i question the motive. the most obvious hypothesis is that they want to launch it against their neighbouring MUSLIM countries. everyone knows this. but when you think of the reason why they keep the facts and figures classified is something to ponder on. i mean they can launch it from a silo or submarine or even a bomber. but range concerned?? there are other MUSLIM countries half a globe away from them. could this be a factor in the secrecy? not only MUSLIM countries. if you can remember about the theory of the fucking Jews wanting to take over the world in the book " The Protocols of the Elders of Zion" it was stated that they planned to eradicate all other races only leaving Jew/Judaism as the one true faith.

some food for thought revolutioknights. questions to ask yourselves include the secrecy of the details, the motive for Israel for nuclear weapons even though they are far superior militarily, and last but not least, what is the world superpowers doing about this? especially US of A.



"He who fights with monsters should look to it that he himself does not become a monster. And when you gaze long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you."

Monday, 26 May 2008

exploitation of a baby's crying

the motherfucker who was considered as the father of Zionism is some pest from Hungary called Theodor Herzl. he decided to be the scum of humanity by leading the Zionist because of an incident in which an innocent french Jew was convicted for spying for Germany. he was so moved by this. the dreyfuss affair as it was called attracted alot of anti-semitism and he began to feel sympathy to his ppl. if i was living back during those times, i would've fucked him up again and again and again.

after feeling sorry, he wrote a book entitled, "The State of the Jews" and went on tour all around Europe promoting his ideology. he got positive receptions from several countries such as Bulgaria and Austria as those countries felt they were inspired by his cause. but i love it when he was snapped back at turkey when the sultan used this exact words after Herzl explained his cause,"if one day the Islamic State falls apart then you can have Palestine for free, but as long as I am alive I would rather have my flesh be cut up than cut out Palestine from the Muslim land". i think any Jew with 3 extra large testicles would crumble and cry after hearing that statement.

Herzl was to never give up. he went on to create Zionist congresses and was fighting hard to establish land in Palestine to house Jews. this prick didnt give up even though several of his proposals were rejected. he kept on trying till he fucking dropped dead at age 44. but it was too late for the fate of the free world. Jews now have a country of its own, completely stealing it from Palestine. for Herzl has already got the ball rolling and after he died someone else picked up the pieces and set the motion going. too bad suicide bombing wasnt invented at that time if not i would send someone to bomb his ass. it'll save countless lives now. I'm talking abt Palestinian lives. are you freaking kidding me!! who the fuck cares about the Jews anyway???


"In 1948, Palestine was lost – that blessed land, the land of the Muslims. Its inhabitants were dispersed and killed. By whom? By the most despicable creatures on the face of the earth – the offspring of apes and pigs"

Friday, 9 May 2008

another quality product from ice cool

the scene is straight out of 1992 Somalia.
a country torn by civil war and genocide decided to open its doors to the world to help. same kinda setting. eerie similarities.

the only difference is that Somalia got hit by famine whereas Myanmar got hit by the 2nd most powerful cyclone to make landfall.

even a country so devastated by such an incident has the balls to intentionally deny any forms of help from various humanitarian agencies. visas for foreign aid-workers were subjected to delays in processing and even rejections. the military junta states that they are not ready to accept help just yet cause they wanna rebuild the country by themselves to prove the junta's worth.

if all of us let our minds drift to the images of destruction and despair all over that country, all of us in the right frame of mind would question the junta's decision in rejecting help. i am sure that most of you revolutioknights have set your eyes upon dozens of pictures depicting death and homelessness everywhere in that part where the cyclone left its mark. and yet help is rejected.

the best is yet to come. news just broke in that the UN are freezing the food supply into Myanmar as there were reports of the fucking junta confiscating all the food supplies meant for the people. what is their motive? that i do not know. but if i were to draw a conclusion, let me take you back into memory lane:

1992 Somalia. after hundreds of thousands were struck with hunger due to an agricultural collapse from the civil wars, the world responded by sending food and medical supplies to that region (same here in Myanmar). food wasnt distributed to the starving people but instead taken away by the clan leaders (comparatively similar, substituted by junta). reason for clan leaders taking the food supply away from the people is to trade for more weapons to further aggravate the civil war. Myanmar has capabilities of this. though the reason for the junta's aggression is not known, that is the conclusion i can possibly draw out.

you can see the angle at which Myanmar is heading to, cross-referenced with Somalia back in the day. Somalia just overthrew their country's leader before plunging into an unforgiving civil war that would last several years after that. compare it to Myanmar, no doubt that they have been into militarism since 1962 and only recently where the world's attention were focused on them in their version of civil war by killing monks in the 2007 anti-government protests. they want to show eradication as a tool to scare the people, same as Mohamed Farrah Aidid did back in 1992.

if not for the ongoing --soon-to-be debacle-- nuclear feud between Iran and North Korea, the "mighty" US of A would've sent in a battalion of US Marines or Task Force Ranger/Delta to restore order and hope into the people. but smart enough for them to conserve strength in case of an armed conflict. or we would have another sad episode of Black Hawk Down or Bakara Market Boogie or Ma-alinti Rangers or Battle of Mogadishu 1993, any way you look at it, we dont want more blood on our hands, unless Zionist blood that is....we want plenty of that.

"Es gibt keine verzweifelten Lagen, es gibt nur verzweifelte Menschen. (There are no desperate situations, there are only desperate people.)"